Part Two:
What Managerial Logic?
How William Clay Ford’s loyalty in his decision
making led to a franchise that consistently underachieved.
The NFL
General Manager (GM) and Head Coach (HC). It’s an understatement to say these
figures are the life-blood of a NFL franchise. Between the two of them, they
have the challenging tasks of working with or heading: the scouting, scheming, drafting,
player development, finances, hiring, and public relations of a franchise, all
under the watchful eye of the NFL owner, 365 days per year. Their work ethic is
the difference between a Lombardi Trophy and mediocrity, so it’s essential that
the GM and HC know what they’re doing. It may be easy to say, but for some,
they can’t wrap their head around this concept.
William Clay
Ford Senior (WCF) was sadly one of these people. He put his blood, sweat, and
tears into ownership of the Detroit Lions, striving hard to win a championship.
In the end though, WCF’s mindset prevented his goals from being achieved. And usually,
it ended in talk of being ‘cursed’ in a complete S.O.L.,
“meltdown (Hanzus).”
Looking back
at WCF’s ownership from 1963 to his death in 2014, one thing sticks out. WCF
ran the Detroit Lions the same today, as back when he purchased the dominant
team in 1963. That may bring up a few question marks, but one piece of evidence
shows it’s the truth. Loyalty. Taught to everyone as child as being essential
to one’s life and defined as, “Faithfulness to commitments or obligations.” In
some instances though, it’s a killer. And as Mike
Hanzus alluded to, “Ford (WCF) was known for his loyalty, but it was
sometimes to a detriment.”
Over the time of WCF’s ownership, there
are many instances where WCF could have given up loyalty, but in line with his
personality, it didn’t happen. He could’ve, after the string of inconsistency and
playoff losses in the 1970s-1990s, given control to his son William
Clay Ford Junior (WCF Jr.), who was apt to run a NFL franchise. WCF, though, ended up not even considering
because he was loyal to the Detroit Lions and had a, “deep desire to win with
the Lions (Hanzus),”
himself. He could’ve recognized that some of the hires that were made at GM and
HC weren’t working out, but WCF stayed pat and despite advice from WCF Jr.,
team president Tom Lewand, and others, contract termination wasn’t an option.
But most importantly, WCF could’ve sought out change, a complete stop to S.O.L.,
and the Lions becoming something more than mediocre. In reality, WCF’s loyalty
in his ownership kept the Detroit Lions irrelevant and always looking for
answers.
And if
you’re looking for one thing WCF’s loyalty, there are only two words to
describe it: Matt
Millen.
You today
can see him being the color commentator on ABC
College Football games, and it’s asked, ‘How could this commentator and
former NFL Super Bowl winning and Hall of Fame linebacker become the
representation of the struggles of the Detroit Lions and WCF?’ In response, Lions
fans say the one remark that haunts them to this day, “0-16.”
On January
9, 2001 though, no one saw an imminent disaster when WCF hired an excited Matt
Millen to take over at GM of this struggling franchise. Many said that this
move, “was impetus for Detroit’s long-awaited resurgence (Meinke),”
and Detroit would finally hoist the Lombardi Trophy after so many long years. What
came after the initial press conference though, no one expected. In the next
seven years, Matt Millen became undoubtedly the worst GM in NFL history.
Hiring head
coaches like Marty
Mohrninweg, Steve Mariucci,
and Rod Marinelli
with no question from WCF, Millen set up the Lions for failure. These people in the organization didn’t have
the right system for the Lions to succeed, whether it be from little player
connectivity to horrible scheming, and caused the team to fall apart at the
fabric. Then, came Millen setting the Lions back with, “Questionable and
sometimes bizarre personnel moves…particularly…in the draft (Meinke).”
Honestly, my nine year old cousin could’ve drafted better than Millen. With no
concept of what’s employed presently in the Detroit Lions organization, like, “the…long-term
needs”, “best available,” or even logic, drafting seemed to make the Lions
worse, never better (Katzenstein).
Picks like Joey Harrington,
Charles
Rogers, and Mike Williams made sure the talent level stayed at its lowest,
even though Millen had chances to choose better. For example, back in the 2005
NFL Draft, the Detroit Lions at draft pick 10 had a chance to take DeMarcus Ware. As Matthew Millen
(Matt Millen’s son) and many experts around the league said, “DeMarcus Ware is
a stud… (would become) a great pass rusher (and) he would fit our (The Detroit
Lions’) scheme (Hanzus).”
Millen on draft day pulled a fast-one
though, and decided to take a shaky Mike Williams at wide receiver instead. After
two years, Williams was released after drug
problems, and Ware became a pro-bowl linebacker in Dallas. Matthew Millen
and the NFL couldn’t believe what illogic they’d witnessed and with it,
established the “Millen-esque (Patra),”
way of doing things.
Even with
the mess that Millen created in the several years he was GM, WCF against advice
again from family and employees, stayed confident in and loyal to Millen. And
with that, the bottom fell out for the Detroit Lions. To 2008, the franchise’s
execution worsened even more, and eventually it took WCF Jr. saying, “He would
(fire Millen)…if he were in charge (Hanzus),”
to make WCF finally fire Millen three games into that season. But the damage
was done, and the Lions “accomplished” a record of 0-16, “a feat never seen
before or since (Hanzus).”
“Matt
Millen’s run as GM of the Detroit Lions has become stuff of “legend” (Hanzus),”
with his 31-84 total record and illogical administration. He essentially drove
the Detroit Lions into the ground, and except with the one good of drafting Calvin
Johnson, to this day, “The Lions (are)…still recovering from the Millen
era.” In Detroit, Matt Millen is up there with Kwame
Kilpatrick as one of the most hated, but it never should’ve ended that way.
By WCF staying loyal to Millen’s decision making for so long, “The Old Man”
could’ve been said to be instrumental to the driving the Lions into the ground.
WCF seemed
to have finally learned his lesson from “0-16” and the past forty-plus years of
failures, and consequently gave WCF Jr. control of the day-to-day operations of
the Detroit Lions in 2009. The Lions remember and are still dealing with the
after-effects of WCF’s loyalty, like with the S.O.L talk, recently terminated
Jim Schwartz, and a losing culture. The Lions are starting to move on though,
and are doing well in striving toward becoming a world class organization. With
WCF recently passed though, it’s hard not to stop and think how improbable it
is that all of this happened to him and the Detroit Lions. But, it’s the Lions,
right? No matter what happens though, Lions fans will always remember WCF’s
loyalty. Not to his employees, but to one city and one team.
Works Cited
Hanzus, Dan.
"Matt Millen's Son on Lions Passing up DeMarcus Ware." NFL.com. N.p., 7 Oct.
2013. Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
Katzenstein,
Josh. "Lions Need to Win Now but Must Consider Future with First-round
Pick."
The Detroit News. N.p., 1 Mar. 2014. Web.
27 Mar. 2014.
Meinke,
Kyle. "5 Days That Defined William Clay Ford's Ownership of the Detroit
Lions."
M-Live. N.p., 9 Mar. 2014. Web.
26 Mar. 2014.
Patra,
Kevin. "Detroit Lions: Best and Worst Draft Picks." NFL.com. N.p., 4 Apr. 2014. Web. 27
Mar. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment